top of page
Search By Tags



Intra-cellular therapies Vs. Controller of patents- A case study
On July 6, dismissing the appeal filed by Intra-cellular Therapies , the Delhi High Court upheld the Controller's decision on the grounds of lack of novelty and non-patentability under Section 3(d) while choosing not to delve into the more rigorously contested inventive-step objection. Besides dealing with the controversial coverage/ disclosure dichotomy, the discussion focused on the “person in the know” versus the "person ordinarily skilled in the art" and the missing lin

Ranjna Mehta-Dutt
5 days ago


Four Oppositions, Fifteen Years, One Grant: The Indian Patent Office's Ribociclib Decision
Novartis AG and Astex Therapeutics Ltd. have finally received a grant of a patent under number 594997 for their application relating to Ribociclib (Kisqali®), a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor indicated for the treatment of HR+/HER2- breast cancer, after contesting four pre-grant oppositions filed against the application in an exhaustive and detailed 198-page order. The application drew oppositions from Natco Pharma and three individual Opponents. The application was filed in 20

Ranjna Mehta-Dutt & Nanki Arneja
Jul 23


Too Close for Comfort: Bombay High Court Holds 'Super Asian Plus' Deceptively Similar To 'Asian Paints
Introduction Recently, in the case of Asian Paints Limited vs. Manju Rani Jindal1, the Bombay High Court discussed the issue of deceptive similarity between two marks. The Court granted a permanent injunction in favour of the Plaintiff, restraining the Defendant from manufacturing, marketing, selling and/or likely to market and sell and/or using in any manner whatsoever in relation to wall putty, cement paints and other goods used in the paint industry, the impugned mark “SUP

Soumya Juneja
Jul 20


The exclusivity paradox: Lessons from Honasa Consumer Ltd. v. Visage Beauty
INTRODUCTION The increasing use of function-oriented product descriptors in the cosmetics and personal care industry has intensified the tension between commercial branding practices and the distinctiveness requirement under trademark law. While descriptive expressions may effectively communicate a product's purpose or characteristics, they ordinarily remain incapable of distinguishing commercial origin and are therefore excluded from trademark protection, as granting a monop

Bhawna Mangla
Jul 18


From Whac-a-Mole to Real-Time Enforcement: How India's Anti-Piracy Injunctions Are Evolving Beyond Dynamic Orders
Every ace at Wimbledon and every goal in a FIFA tournament is worth far more than the excitement it brings to fans. Behind every live sporting event lies a multi-million-dollar ecosystem of broadcasting rights, with media companies investing heavily for the privilege of exclusive live coverage. Yet, within moments of the first whistle or serve, unauthorised streams begin appearing across rogue websites, IPTV platforms and mobile applications, reaching viewers around the world

Divanshi Gupta
Jul 13


Registering the Whole, Suing the Part: The Composite-Mark Paradox in Indian Trademark Law
Introduction A trademark applicant and a trademark plaintiff often want opposite things from the same mark. At the counter of the Registry, the safest route to registration is to present the mark as an indivisible composite- a label, a device, a word fused to a stylized get-up and to insist examiners and opponents judge it as a whole. The applicant usually plays down the ordinary, descriptive, or common features and asks for credit on the overall impression. Yet when that reg

Niharika Puri
Jul 8


Typography and Trademark Law in India: The Strategic Role of Stylization
Introduction In today’s commercial climate, a brand is rarely just a phonetic name, it is an entire visual get-up that speaks to the subconscious before a single word is actually processed. Typography i.e., the deliberate, often extensive arrangement, is the silent engine of this recognition. Whether it is specific letter spacing or a stylized stroke, these choices are the markers of a brand's DNA. In India, protecting these intellectual property assets requires navigating

Alisha Rastogi
Jul 3


The EU-India FTA 2026: Navigating A New Horizon for Trademarks and Brand Enforcement in India
Introduction Agreed on January 27, 2026 and being hailed as the “mother of all trade deals”, the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (“FTA” or “The Agreement”) is set to thrust India into a new trading era. Welcomed as a turning point in global trade, this deal aims to connect two of the most massive economic markets in the world. It is also likely to significantly impact intellectual property rights and laws in the regions. Without disrupting India’s existing legal framework, it i

Vrinda Sehgal
Jun 24


The Shield of Section 18: Protecting Prior Adopters from Subsequent Commercial Dominance
Introduction For commercial brands, the race to secure a trademark is fought on two distinct fronts: at the registry desk and in the marketplace. Recently, the Delhi High Court has spotlighted this delicate balance in its ruling in Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trademarks & Anr.[1], and has reinforced that the rights of a senior adopter or the prior filer shall triumph over the rights of a subsequent user’s market evidence. This judgment underscores that eve

Pari Malhotra
Jun 9


Invisible Use, Visible Harm: High Court Holds Platform Accountable For Trademark Keywords
INTRODUCTION For years, Indian businesses have quietly watched their competitors lift their brand names off the search results page. By bidding per click on a rival’s trademark, your own sponsored link surfaces the moment a customer types that rival’s name. The Delhi High Court’s decision in Hindware Ltd. v. Grohe India Pvt. Ltd.- confronts the practice directly. The Court held that selling a registered trademark as an advertising keyword is itself an infringing “use in adver

Niharika Puri
Jun 8
Archive
bottom of page

























