The Indian Patent Act sets out clear provisions on how to amend patent claims, while the Patent Amendment Rules 2016 allow claims to be...

The Hon’ble Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) in the case of Red Bull AG v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited & Ors., dismissed...

In order to contain the effect of the nationwide lockdown on Intellectual Property matters in India, the Indian Intellectual Property...

“We don’t have a choice whether we do social media, the question is how well we do it.” This phrase by author Erik Qualman demonstrates...

In the recent case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt Ltd. & Another v. CBI, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India vide...

The Indian Patent Office on November 6, 2020, notified the Patents (2nd Amendment) Rules, 2020 which have come into force from November...

Inventions in the field of automobiles have come a long way from the steam-powered automobiles to electric and driverless vehicles paving...

IPAB holds claims of divisional application must be derived from claims of the parent application and not merely from the specification

IPAB holds that the inventor declaration filed under Rule 4.17 (ii) of the PCT Regulations is sufficient to establish Proof of right.

INTRODUCTION The digital era has created another platform for brand owners to engage with the public and to assert the presence of their...