infringement | candcip

Practical approach to Non-Working Patent: High Court balances interests and industry’s needs

Aastha Joshi

Sep 3

Practical approach to Non-Working Patent: High Court balances interests and industry’s needs

Introduction: In an order dated August 04, 2023, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court (hereinafter referred to as “the Hon’ble Court’’) has...

Relief for Mayo Foundation against unlawful use of its “Mayo” marks by a charitable trust

Sanskriti Rastogi

Aug 8

Relief for Mayo Foundation against unlawful use of its “Mayo” marks by a charitable trust

INTRODUCTION The Delhi High Court, vide a recent order granted interim relief to Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research...

Court upholds rights of Plaintiff against Defendant's violation of terms of co-marketing agreements

Divanshi Gupta

Dec 23, 2022

Court upholds rights of Plaintiff against Defendant's violation of terms of co-marketing agreements

INTRODUCTION Recently, in the case of M/S Kohinoor Seed Fields India Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Veda Seed Sciences Pvt. Ltd., the Delhi High Court...

“Frappuccino” an exclusive trade mark of Starbucks: High Court

Ankita Sabharwal

Dec 15, 2022

“Frappuccino” an exclusive trade mark of Starbucks: High Court

Introduction The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Starbucks Corporation v. LOL Cafe & Anr[1] has restrained a Jaipur-based...

Value of Trademarks Can Be Estimated In Monetary Terms: Delhi High Court

Divanshi Gupta

Nov 9, 2022

Value of Trademarks Can Be Estimated In Monetary Terms: Delhi High Court

Introduction Recently, in the case of Mr Sanjay Chadha Trading as M/s Eveready Tools Emporium v. Union of India & Ors., the Division...

India: Registration of a device mark does not grant exclusive rights to the use of its components

Anushka Aman

Oct 28, 2022

India: Registration of a device mark does not grant exclusive rights to the use of its components

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court (“the Court”) in the matter of Vasundhra Jewellers Pvt. Ltd v. Kirat Vinodbhai Jadvani & Anr,[1]denied the...

Test of Unwary Consumer: Carlsberg Granted Interim Injunction Against Tensberg

Vrinda Sehgal

Sep 29, 2022

Test of Unwary Consumer: Carlsberg Granted Interim Injunction Against Tensberg

Introduction Recently in the case of CARLSBERG BREWERIES A/S v. TENSBERG BREWERIES INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. & ORS.[1], the Delhi High Court...

Abhinav Bhalla

Sep 28, 2022

Delhi High Court: Louis Vuitton successfully enforces rights in its LV (logo) marks

Overview Recently, in the case of Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Javed Khan & Ors[1], the Delhi High Court decreed the suit in favour of...

High Court: Telegram To Disclose Information Of Copyright Infringers; Location Of Servers Immaterial

Aaina Sethi

Sep 27, 2022

High Court: Telegram To Disclose Information Of Copyright Infringers; Location Of Servers Immaterial

Introduction In a recent copyright dispute of Neetu Singh & Anr. v. Telegram FZ LLC & Ors.[1], the Delhi High Court has directed the...

High Court: Test For Determining Similarity Is Possibility And Not Probability Of Confusion

Vrinda Sehgal

Sep 22, 2022

High Court: Test For Determining Similarity Is Possibility And Not Probability Of Confusion

Introduction Recently in the case of Astral Poly Technik Limited & Anr. v. Astralglee through its proprietor Ms Pooja Surendra Ayre &...

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

From refusal to grant: India Patent Oﬃce grants a patent after the High Court orders reconsideration

INDIA: HC issues directions in view of the recurrent unreasoned orders passed by the Patent Office

HC holds no flexibility for filing request for extension to file national phase patent application

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

Digital Health

Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”

IPAB holds claims of divisional must be derived from claims of parent (not just from specification)

India: Divisional Patent Applications-Delhi High Court Clarifies The Scope

INDIA - High Court holds 'article' under the Designs Act must be capable of independent existence

'PRODUCT-BY-PROCESS' CLAIMS: VIFOR'S PATENT DISPUTE TAKES NEW TURN WITH DIVISION BENCH’S PERSPECTIVE

Architectural Works in the Intellectual Property Regime

Practical approach to Non-Working Patent: High Court balances interests and industry’s needs

UNDERSTANDING THE RULES OF POST-GRANT OPPOSITION IN INDIA – HIGH COURT’S ANALYSIS

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

The Anusandhan National Research Foundation Act, 2023: India’s entry into the R&D big leagues

India: An unreasoned refusal order is in violation of the procedure and intent of the Patents Act

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

info@candcip.com

Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Archive

Search By Tags

Follow Us