Saumya Kapoor
- Dec 22, 2020
Delhi High Court rejects the request for a “two-tier” Confidentiality Club
A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court, in a patent infringement suit between Interdigital Technology Corporation and Xiaomi...
Vrinda Sehgal
- Dec 22, 2020
Media conglomerates dispute and "the nation wants to know"
Introduction The Delhi High Court restrained the famous media personality Arnab Goswami and Republic TV from using the mark “NEWSHOUR” in...
Saumya Kapoor
- Dec 17, 2020
Monthly Round Up: November 2020
A. Notable Developments: 1. Draft of the proposed “The High Court of Delhi Rules Governing Patent Suits, 2020” open for...
Vrinda Sehgal
- Nov 9, 2020
Supreme Court Affirms: Any Stay Granted By A Court Automatically Expires Within Six Months
In the recent case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt Ltd. & Another v. CBI, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India vide...
Shivarpita Nailwal
- Oct 31, 2020
IPAB holds claims of divisional must be derived from claims of parent (not just from specification)
IPAB holds claims of divisional application must be derived from claims of the parent application and not merely from the specification
Shivarpita Nailwal
- Oct 31, 2020
INDIA: IPAB holds PCT declaration under Rule 4.17 (ii) acceptable as a Proof of right Requirement
IPAB holds that the inventor declaration filed under Rule 4.17 (ii) of the PCT Regulations is sufficient to establish Proof of right.