Anti Suit Injunctions: Anti Suit Injunctions (ASI) are gaining prominence in today’s day and time owing to the increased international...

The medical device sector is one of the fastest growing industries in India and has witnessed a steady double-digit growth. A study...

INTRODUCTION Trade secrets offer protection to a wide range of subject matter as data or information that do not qualify protection as...

A. Notable Developments: 1. Annual Report 2018-2019[1] An overall increase of 15% in the filing of applications for various IPRs as...

The Hon’ble Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) in the case of Red Bull AG v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited & Ors., dismissed...

In order to contain the effect of the nationwide lockdown on Intellectual Property matters in India, the Indian Intellectual Property...

In the recent case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt Ltd. & Another v. CBI, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India vide...

IPAB holds claims of divisional application must be derived from claims of the parent application and not merely from the specification

IPAB holds that the inventor declaration filed under Rule 4.17 (ii) of the PCT Regulations is sufficient to establish Proof of right.

The Ministry of Commerce and Industry has notified the Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2020 to further amend the Patents Rules, 2003. The Draft...