June - 2019

top of page

Chadha & Chadha IP

info@candcip.com

Asus restrained from using its ZEN and ZENFONE marks by the Delhi High Court

-

Jun 12, 2019

Asus restrained from using its ZEN and ZENFONE marks by the Delhi High Court

On June 4, 2019 the Delhi High Court, through the single judge bench of Justice Manmohan, passed a judgement restraining Asus Technology...

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, May 2019

Chetan Chadha

Jun 4, 2019

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, May 2019

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion has published Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2019 (the “draft Rules”) on May 31, 2019....

Featured Posts

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

Madras HC notifies dedicated Intellectual Property Division for hearing IP Matters

From refusal to grant: India Patent Oﬃce grants a patent after the High Court orders reconsideration

From refusal to grant: India Patent Oﬃce grants a patent after the High Court orders reconsideration

INDIA: HC issues directions in view of the recurrent unreasoned orders passed by the Patent Office

INDIA: HC issues directions in view of the recurrent unreasoned orders passed by the Patent Office

HC holds no flexibility for filing request for extension to file national phase patent application

HC holds no flexibility for filing request for extension to file national phase patent application

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

India: Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 published, comments invited from Stakeholders

Digital Health

Digital Health

Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”

Redbull's fight for “wings”; IPAB dismisses Red Bull’s petition for not being a “Person Aggrieved”

IPAB holds claims of divisional must be derived from claims of parent (not just from specification)

IPAB holds claims of divisional must be derived from claims of parent (not just from specification)

Recent Posts

India: Divisional Patent Applications-Delhi High Court Clarifies The Scope

INDIA - High Court holds 'article' under the Designs Act must be capable of independent existence

'PRODUCT-BY-PROCESS' CLAIMS: VIFOR'S PATENT DISPUTE TAKES NEW TURN WITH DIVISION BENCH’S PERSPECTIVE

Architectural Works in the Intellectual Property Regime

Practical approach to Non-Working Patent: High Court balances interests and industry’s needs

UNDERSTANDING THE RULES OF POST-GRANT OPPOSITION IN INDIA – HIGH COURT’S ANALYSIS

Cinematography Redefined: Analysing Cinematography (Amendment) Bill, 2023

The Anusandhan National Research Foundation Act, 2023: India’s entry into the R&D big leagues

India: An unreasoned refusal order is in violation of the procedure and intent of the Patents Act

INDIA: HC clarifies jurisdiction of revocation petitions and power to transfer cases between Courts

Archive

Search By Tags

Follow Us

bottom of page